Talk:History of the Jews in Mauritius/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 17:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
"because they were denied entry to Palestine by the British Government for not having entry permits.[1]" -> For me the last part conveys the same meaning as the first part; they were denied because they were not permitted to enter is the same. Do you know why they were denied? I can think why but if you don't find any useful information I propose to delete the last part of this sentence. --GoP _T ^C _N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Removed last part. -- BCS (t · c · !) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref 2 says 127, not 128.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Changed. -- BCS (t · c · !) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The author of the picture is needed. If you don't know the name then simply write that the author is unknown
Fixed. -- BCS (t · c · !) 21:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: On hold
Pass/Fail: