Talk:Hotels4u

Hi there.

I have recently updated the article to include more in-line citations and 3rd party sources for the page. I have also added the Hotel category to the bottom of the page as asked. Finally I have also linked Thomas Cook Group Wiki to this one as Thomas Cook Group owns Hotels4u.com.

Is there anything else I can do to improve this page?

Thanks

Sam

Hi, Sam. You have definitely put a lot of effort into this article. However, this still seems to be written by someone paid by Hotels4u [[1]]. This sort of article, though well-written, does not meet Wikipedia's policies due to a apparent conflict of interest (COI), lack of a neutral Point of View (POV) and being mostly a promotional article for Hotels4u. Based on the fine writing and attention to detail here, I look forward to your further Wikipedia contributions on subjects you do not have a COI. Stesmo (talk) 22:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have made some subtle changes to the post, please let me know if you want more to be changed. Changes Include:-

Removed

“which can be booked as far as one in year in advance or even minutes before check-in”

==Business Model== “The business model of the company is to supply leisure holiday accommodation and airport transfers to the retail trade in response to the growth in the low cost airlines sector, their route network and the increase in dynamic packaging. The model was then additionally rolled out as a B2C model in 2007. Hotels4u/Medhotels have developed into a market leader for selling beach-based products with strong and enduring relationships with the trade. Through growing e-commerce activity the business has built a database of over 400,000 direct email addresses and receives over 5 million visits per year through natural searches on Google.”

Added

However their adverts created a lot of negative of media attention and were mentioned in the Birmingham Mail [3] (January 2014), Daily Mail (January 2014),[4] The Telegraph Travel [5] (January 2014) and travel site TTG Digital (December 2013).[6] for upsetting the residents of Birmingham.