Talk:Hour record (Unified rule change)

Do we need another article for this

Not sure why we need an entirely seperate article for the hour record since unified rule change when all the information is already on teh hour record page Dimspace (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly Dimspace, the hour record page is a mess, there are tables everywhere, big blocks if text about other forms of hour record so I don't think the hour record article is to easy to navigate and to easy to read. Look at how simple this article is. It's much easier to read and conveys the hour record situation a lot more clearly that the hour record page. If you want a hand re-writing it then I'm more than happy to help- otherwise post on the project talk page and see if anyone there has some ideas. XyZAn (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the big table that has appeared on the hour record page is a nightmare, i did autohide it but it was reverted back to unhidden again.

Im considering that possibly a seperate article for "recumbent" hour record, and make the regular hour record track cycling only. That would reduce the size of the article greatly and be a step towards streamlining it. Dimspace (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]