Talk:Human Ape

National Geographic US channel and National Geographic international channels commission Pioneer Productions, England, on human ape

The link to the Nat Geo site is http://www.ngcipressroom.com/releases.aspx?id=273 , which is a press release.

National Geographic program Human Apes features Great Ape Trust bonobos, orangutans

There is also another article I found on the net: http://www.greatapetrust.org/media/releases/2008/nr_13a08.php

REQUEST

Could anyone contribute on this article please? Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 00:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus for Removal of "Speedy Delete" Based on DB-Empty?

The original author has added considerable content since the db-empty tag was placed, and after a very brief initial investigation, including a quick search for matching phrases via Google, my first impression is that the content isn't disallowed under any policies that I'm currently aware of. Thus it seems to me that the speedy has to go.

I recognize there may be other grounds for deletion, and that this isn't the best way to begin a new article, but let's cross those bridges when we come to them, and create a new discussion section or sections here to correspond to any new tags that may eventuate. I'll just remark, also, that my first impression would tend to suggest that userfication might be an appropriate recourse with the article in its current, under-development state. Ohiostandard (talk) 02:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, then. Speedy declined by user DGG, according to history. Recommend that original author consider moving article to user subpage using proper procedures and assistance of help desk, while article remains under development, to forestall placement of additional delete tag(s) based on other possible objections. Ohiostandard (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could other users please format the document as per Wikipedia policies

Dear friends, Could you all please format this article as per wikipedia policies, since I have read that wikipedia believes in complementarity - my weakness covered by someone else's strengths. I had initially edited the document in Open Office.org and then exported the file as a MediaWiki.txt. Some formatting in the parent document were lost. And thanks Ohiostandard for placing a positive review.

BTW, is there an updated add-on in OpenOffice.org to convert odt files to mediawiki.txt files.

Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 03:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove the orphan tag

Kindly remove the orphan tag. The links to kanzi, Sue Rumbaugh, panzee and panbanisha have been introduced. The topic is not orphan now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkpsusmitaa (talk • contribs) 11:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove the primarysources tag

Kindly remove the primarysources tag. I have introduced the reference of a book that ensures that the matter is true, not fictitious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkpsusmitaa (talk • contribs) 11:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is no one acting? Shall I remove the tags?

Dear moderators, you have not responded. Shall I remove the tags? Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 00:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one has responded, so I have removed the tags

None has responded. So I think it is appropriate to remove the tags. If you have some problem with the editing, you are free to add the tags once again, and I would try to see what needs to be done to further update the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkpsusmitaa (talk • contribs) 09:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Format this article!

I am not good at editing, but this article seems to be written as an advertisement. Can someone add that tag to the top or edit this artile to reflect neutrality? 99.249.10.67 (talk) 00:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]