Talk:Hyperglycinemia

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Medicine

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Tone/style advice?[edit]

At the beginning of the Misdiagnosis section, the sentence starts with "Unfortunately,". I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, but this doesn't really seem to match with how most wiki articles are written. While I agree that misdiagnosis is unfortunate, should this label be omitted, making the sentence something like "This condition..."?

Also, where I would I find a list of templates that I could use to mark articles that need correction in different ways? Thanks, Myoglobin (talk) 18:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?[edit]

This article is too long to be a stub. I have removed the stub indications in the article, and changed the class in the WikiProject template.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be a disambiguation page[edit]

I propose that this article should be a disambiguation page, listing Propionic acidemia and Glycine encephalopathy. Its content should be merged into those two articles. My reasoning is that this article as it stands is poorly formatted and largely duplicates those two. What little sourced content is here but not in one of the other two can be merged for reader convenience, so they don't have to look through multiple pages to get the full picture of these diseases. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 08:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

could be in favor, but would prefer to see other opinions--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would agree with the above proposal. CV9933 (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Only the History section had non-duplicate content, and it was added with edits to Propionic acidemia. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 07:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]