Talk:IMac Pro/GA1

GA Review

Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 22:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

File:IMac Pro.svg - License is correct. Sticklers may say we need a photograph to ensure accurate representation, but looking at other images in the category, this is very representational. I hate that a product can be displayed accurately as an SVG — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose review

languished for years without any updates - While it probably felt like that for Mac users, this feels very purple (and therefore non-neutral). Should be rephrased
focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) - is this missing an article? Or should dual graphics-processing unit be dual graphics-processing units?
I've made some edits; please review.
Earwig gives only 3.8% likelihood of copyvio, flagging only names and other elements that cannot be paraphrased. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

Per WP:CITESTYLE, we should ensure that the referencing style is consistent. Consequently, the capitalization of the references should be made consistent (compare [1] and [2], [7] and [8], etc.)
Although it is not a GA criterion and does not affect the results of this review, I recommend archiving your online references to future-proof the article.
Please ensure references are in numeric order (note [7][6], [22][6], [22][8])
Spotchecks (based on this revision):

[2]

Supports: "new Mac Pro being developed", announcement of iMac Pro, small design focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) had been a mistake

[5]

Supports: same chassis design as the 27-inch iMac (including screen etc.), jacks etc. (not cited for these, but supports them)

[16]

Supports: discontinuation and delisting; reviewing the article on MacRumours, despite the name it does appear sufficiently reliable for claims such as this.

[22]

Supports: Svelte frame, quiet, performance worth price

Conclusion

Overall, this article and its presentation are excellent. Just a few nitpicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Crisco 1492, thanks for the review. I’m currently traveling but will be back at a stable connection in about five days, and will jump in on the changes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 10:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, David Fuchs. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Crisco 1492, sorry for the wait. I believe I've addressed all the comments above. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 17:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe that does. I'm happy to say that this meets the GA Criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.