Talk:IPhone 6/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 03:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Article looks pretty good to start. -- numbermaniac (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

The "clarification needed" tag needs to be addressed in the first section (after the lead).

Is it necessary to repeat the paragraph about the discontinuation of the 128 GB model?

It should be explained that PPI means Pixels per inch. A link to the article should suffice. SSTFlyer has done two of these, I did the final one since it was quick.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without spelling and grammar errors:

   The points I stated above need to be addressed.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The review is on hold until the notes above this list are fixed.

Passed. -- numbermaniac (talk) 06:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)