Jump to content

Talk:Icelandic Phallological Museum/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article. However the dead link needs to be fixed. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link fixed. oyasumi (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "and an unfortunate stray polar bear" - "unfortunate" - not encyclopedic wording
Removed unfortunate. oyasumi (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "penis he owned as a child" - had owned since childhood, or had owned as a child?
I think had owned as a child is right here, but I'm not sure. oyasumi (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • He put the museum up for sale in 2003, and offered it to the city of Reykjavík as a gift" - seem contradictory
He did both, nobody ever bought it and the city never accepted the gift. It was handed to his son in 2012. oyasumi (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "just the front tip" - all quotes need an immediate citation
  • Is there a fee to tour the museum?
But wouldn't that be against WP:NOPRICES? oyasumi (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
  • You don't have to give the price. It can say "for a fee" or whatever.
Yes, there's a fee. 1000 Icelandic króna. I'm not sure where to put this in the article, though. oyasumi (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article, nicely presented!

MathewTownsend (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
    B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources:
    B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:
    B. Remains focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: