Talk:Infrastructure of the Brill Tramway/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DavidCane (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   made some copy edits

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   very widely sourced

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   not much more could be said. Main articles and station articles, cover all other aspects.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Yep

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Once again a superior product from the House of Iridescent.--DavidCane (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)