Talk:Intel 80386EX

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Intel has discontinued the 80386 line of processors. PCN 106013-01 has the details. What would be a good choice to replace the 80386 so that software developed for that platform could run without modification?

Any subsequent x86 processor (486, Pentium, Pentium II, etc...) can execute 80386 programs without modifications. inclusivedisjunction (talk) 05:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a question for you...

Bus width: 16, 32, or adaptable to both? Article doesn't currently say... Presumably the line that says "variant of 80386EX" is supposed to say either 80386SX or 80386DX, but the typo makes it impossible to tell. 146.199.76.255 (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: nevermind, I found an Intel datasheet within seconds on google, that states it as essentially a 386SX in terms of raw code execution, just with an additional "resume" instruction and some slight cycle timing changes (as well as a bunch of additional IO and the like specific to its embedded-system implementation). Article updated to reflect this. 146.199.76.255 (talk) 19:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]