Talk:Intermarket analysis

{{helpme}} Please guide me, as I would love to have more reviews and guidance regarding this topic. As this is a valuable topic for the financial world. Sincere thanks once more..

Frankly, it reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article.

In addition, I have some concerns about the content. You say:

Intermarket analysis can be though of as a form of fundamental analysis

yet it sounds more like technical analysis than fundamental analysis.

The following statement:

Hence, intermarket market analysis can be though of as a type of instantaneous fundamental analysis and is not really meant to work on a tick by tick basis. It gives you a general bias and direction.

is an assertion, but is not obvious, nor supported.

Some statements are unintelligible:

There are many approaches to intermarket analysis like mechanical, rule based (while not mechanical via a different angle).

Many statements are assertions without a reference:

The most widely accepted correlation is the inverse correlation between stock prices and interest rates;

(Not to mention that it isn't true. There is a far more widely accepted correlation, that between bond prices and interest rates.)

This isn't even a sentence:

A really simple concept for Intermarket based systems.

I don't feel it is suitable, nor even easily correctable.--SPhilbrick T 22:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere thanks for your guidance, shall look into the matter. Please give a week or so, please.. Moreover, if it is possible to move it back to my own userspace to make it a better article before going live.. please do so.. Sincere thanks and apologies once more..

Ruthiecameryn (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]