Talk:Interspersed repeat

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

7/6/2005 I cleaned up some errors and created hyperlinks to other wikipedia pages and an external web site.... please remove this from cleanup now.

9/7/2006 I reverted some vandalism of this page back to the Sept. 2005 version.

This article is currently very strange. It puts forth a theory that is by no means accepted in mainstream biology and presents it as an uncontroversial fact. I get the feeling that the whole article is written by a single person trying to put forth a pet theory. 83.227.227.16 (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find it strange also, and have a similar feeling that it represents a pet theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.39.108 (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3/3/2011 References are now integrated within the text per suggestion from Guerillero

December 9, 2013: All changes made by Medusa15 (a.k.a. Rachel Kilmer) were erased, since they were lifted from a book in press without the permission of the author (me). The Wikipedia project was supposed to entail independent research and data gathering by the students. Rachel Kilmer merely copy-pasted parts of my book. Dan Graur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogrt (talk • contribs) 05:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]