Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 215 (Utah)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

Not bad, just a few minor things to fix

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The history section is a bit unclear, especially the second sentence. It may need to be reworded to make it clearer.
    True. I'll attempt to get to that soon.
    Meh, I just fixed that sentence that was the most outstanding. I read over it but found no other clarity problems because I'm familiar with the route; what else would need to be fixed in that section? CL21:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Better. - Algorerhythms (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    In the route description section, are all the paragraphs referenced from Ref 3? If so, there should probably be a tag at the end of each of the paragraphs to make that clear. Also, Ref 7 might not be considered a reliable source.
    Ref 3 problem is fixed. As for Ref 7, previous GAs have passed with this source. Perhaps this doesn't change anything, but it's for the record
    In that case, I'm willing to pass the GA if you can remove the tag on Ref 7. - Algorerhythms (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. CL00:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold, awaiting changes Algorerhythms (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Passed, after changes made. - Algorerhythms (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the review. Not everything has been addressed but I'll try to get to it tomorrow or perhaps Wednesday. Thanks again - CL03:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]