Talk:Interstate 29 in Iowa/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk) 17:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am holding the article. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- The lead seems a bit short --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Lengthened a bit. –Fredddie™ 22:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- "US 20 Bus. traffic is forced onto the interstate for 1/2 miles (0.80 km) before it exits via the volleyball interchange which represents the national northern end of U.S. Route 77." - forced on seems like poor wording. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- First three sentences in History read kind of choppy. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- No need to link interstate highway again in History. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Bottom of RJL needs {{Jctbtm}}. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Overlinking in references. Only need to link Iowa DOT once. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- File:I-29 (IA) map.svg needs a GIS / outline source. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- The 85 map is a dead link --Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
I have addressed your concerns. –Fredddie™ 22:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)