Talk:Iracema

Brazil: Arts High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as High-importance).

Novels: 19th century High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.

Infobox

The infobox currently is a bit ambiguous. It distinguishes between the English and Portuguese original in the publication dates, but otherwise doesn't indicate which of the two the information given refers to. For example, currently the publisher is listed as the London-based English-language publisher, Bickers, while the Portuguese-language publisher in Rio de Janeiro, B. L. Garnier, is ignored. The title is also the English-language title (which differs from the title in Portuguese) and the translator is listed, all of which lead one to conclude that this box is about the English-language edition (although there have been two additional translations, an a recently-released new edition of the Burton translation). But if so, why list the date of the original Portuguese translation? And why list that date without qualification to indicate that it is the original version? As it stands, I think this is a bit confusing! Kslarsen (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and changed the publisher to Garnier, because the Template:Infobox Book template indicates that what should be listed. Kslarsen (talk) 14:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]