Talk:Ismail ax

Merge with Cho Seung-hui

I propose that whatever parts of the article are not original research be merged with Cho Seung-hui. No need for a separate article. Matt Gies 20:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Very little of this article is anything other than pointless speculation, and I would propose it simply be deleted entirely instead of "merged" -- until there's any sort of conclusive evidence as to what it meant in the Cho Seung-Hui context, there's nothing newsworthy here. Captain Annoying 20:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems painfully obvious that nothing in this article is sourced and it should simply be redirected to Cho Seung-hui. I have already redirected it once, so I will ask the editor who undid the redirect for comment. -Ektar 21:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was sourcing the articles when you deleted it. Thanks. -Penfish 16:55, 18 April 2007 (EST)