Talk:Issue network
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Great article on Issue Networks. I understood the information fully, and you details are carefully thought out. Easy to read, but might add more information to the last couple of paragraphs. You only have 2/25 sources listed, and no sources in the article at all. Add sources before presentation day. All in all great job!!!!! -Kenzie Poston
After reading this while preparing for a test on this subject tomorrow, I noticed that significant sections of this article appeared to be quite low quality, especially the section on iron triangles and interest groups. Two of the subsections (the main iron triangle subsection and the entire interest group section) were practically definitions of those two articles, and were riddled with bad capitalization, broken links, and non-neutral point of view. I've removed those two subsections for the time being, and as for the remaining one, I removed the redundant example, removed the opinions, and tried to make the language clearer. I'm not even necessarily sure the section is absolutely needed, but I suppose some people would like the comparison it provides. - Samuel Lipsutz
Start a discussion about improving the Issue network page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Issue network" page.
