Jump to content

Talk:Italian cruiser Francesco Ferruccio/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Caponer (talk · contribs) 17:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmvogel 66, I will complete a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- Caponer (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Sturmvogel 66, I've completed a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article, and I find that it meets all the criteria for passage to Good Article status. Prior to its passage, however, I have shared below some comments and questions that should be addressed. Thanks again for all your hard work on this article. -- Caponer (talk) 17:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lede

  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines the cruiser, establishes the cruiser's necessary context, and explains why the cruiser is notable.
  • The info box is beautifully formatted and its content is sourced within the prose of the text and by the referenced cited therein.
  • The image of Giuseppe Garibaldi is released into the public domain is therefore acceptable for use here.
  • The lede could stand to have some more content included from the "Design and description" section for a more comprehensive summary of the entire article. This could be done by stating how many guns the ship had, or mentioning the size and number of its compliment.
  • The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

Design and description

  • This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.

Construction and service

  • Wiki-link La Maddalena, Sardinia, Levant, and Crete in the first paragraph.
  • Wiki-link Tripoli in the second paragraph.
  • In the third paragraph, it should be specified for the reader that the actions around Ragusa were in the Adriatic Sea.
  • This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.