Talk:James W. Pennebaker/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MTHarden (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of July 31, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Failed
- 2. Factually accurate?: Failed
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Failed
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass (but mainly because of the lack of information)
- 5. Article stability? Pass.
- 6. Images?: Failed
There are many spelling, grammar and style problems in this article. While there is an image it has little to do with the article and is presented without context. There are few sources, and three of them are from the University of Texas web-space. The coverage of the topic is not broad enough leaving a very incomplete treatment of Pennebaker's life. It was premature to submit this article for Good-article review. If major revisions were made and a significant change to the tone of information presented then perhaps at a much later date this article could be re-evaluated.