Jump to content

Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Amagi/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 (talk · contribs) 17:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this review. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 1

[edit]
  • "and completed late in the war; she never embarked her complement of aircraft and spent the war in Japanese waters." - Replace the semicolon with a comma.
    • Good catch.
  • "aircraft on Kure Naval Base." - at Kure Naval Base?
    • Prepositions are always tricky.
  • What does "purpose-built" mean?
    • Designed and built as a carrier.
  • "and she was ordered to be camouflaged." - Nix the "and".
    • Howabout "she" instead?
  • You did not mention Mount Amagi in the article proper.
    • Didn't think that I needed to since I cited it in the lede.
  • Why are six Unryū carriers listed in the navbox at bottom if only three were completed?
    • Because the other three were at least laid down.
  • Would it be useful to clarify that the Task Forces were American in nationality?

Criterion 3

[edit]

No comments for change here, but I do wonder; what permitted you to expand the Design and description section to the extent that you did?