Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Passed. Amazing work Sturmvogel 66 Cos ^{(X + Z)} 15:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Stable?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

The only image is in public domain and is relevant Cos ^{(X + Z)} 23:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

Earwig show a 2.9% so there is no copyvio Cos ^{(X + Z)} 23:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammer

@Sturmvogel 66: I have some things I want you to do under this section. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead/Lede

Mid-year the destroyer was turned over to Great Britain and was scrapped in early 1948. add a comma after "Mid-year".

Design and description

all good

Construction and career

One of the second batch of Akizuki-class destroyers authorized in the 1941 Rapid Naval Armaments Program, add "Being" to the start of the sentence and replace "batch" with "batches".
- Being is fine, but batches doesn't work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

Source check

all citations are styled well
all citations are reliable
meets wp:or

Has major aspects and is focused?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. See if my corrections are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are Cos ^{(X + Z)} 15:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.