Talk:Jay Park/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Most glaring issue is the tag... the article is wildly unsourced throughout post-2013. It also fails accessibility requirements for visually impaired readers. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 01:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DanielleTH:. Just a ping to say this is still open. The person who opens individual reassessment usually closes when they feel enough time has passed for the issues to be addressed. Just a FYI, but I don't think accessibility is a GA requirement. I vaguely recall a proposal to make it one, but not sure what happened to that. Anyway the citations are more than enough reasons to delist. AIRcorn (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you, I forgot about this reassessment since it didn't get much attention. Obviously my concerns haven't been addressed, so I'm delisting. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 15:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]