Jump to content

Talk:John Morrison and the Miz/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • The article is well referenced, all web links are live. There are no ambiguous wiki links. The cited references support the statements made in the article. The sources appear to be reliable secondary sources. I find no evidence of original research. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC) I fixed some wiki redirects. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • There is no evidence of edit warring, updates are made as and when notable new events are reported. The talk page show evidence of editors working together to improve the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Seeing as neither ThinkBlue or NiciVampireHeart are online at the moment to my knowledge, if there are any problems I'll take care of them for them. Just to inform you of that. I told Nici I would if neither were online. From what it looks like, I'll probably not need to.--WillC 20:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]