Talk:K-22 (Kansas highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rschen7754 07:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Image nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Lead
- K-22 is a 3.087 miles (4.968 km) long highway in the U.S. State of Kansas. - should be singular. Also, I believe you need a dash between 3.087 and mile (though I could be wrong?)
- It should still use the convert templates - I'm pretty sure there's a way to get the right format, look at the documentation. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed.— PCB 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- It should still use the convert templates - I'm pretty sure there's a way to get the right format, look at the documentation. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Route description
- The National Bridge Inventory doesn't indicate the position of the bridge (except for the mileage)... and I'm not sure that that's sufficient for what it's being used to support.
- It supports the name of the creek which wasn't on Google Maps. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it doesn't support where the road crosses it. I'll get back to you on this one. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- The mileage should be enough, so I'll let this go. --Rschen7754 20:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it doesn't support where the road crosses it. I'll get back to you on this one. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- It supports the name of the creek which wasn't on Google Maps. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- History
- A designation for K-22 began in 1932 - not very good phrasing. Also, you need to cite a 1931 map and a 1932 map for this to work.
- Better... the problem is now you have to say in between 1927 and 1932. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the 1927 map, I noticed that there's another K-22 marked on that map, in northwest Kansas near the Nebraska border. You should provide some information about that designation. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't notice. I'll have to add that in sometime later. — PCB 01:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Added. — PCB 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't notice. I'll have to add that in sometime later. — PCB 01:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the 1927 map, I noticed that there's another K-22 marked on that map, in northwest Kansas near the Nebraska border. You should provide some information about that designation. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Better... the problem is now you have to say in between 1927 and 1932. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
This designation was decommissioned between January and July of 1938. - where do you get January from?- There was a January map which I suppose I will have to cite. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
with today's routing from US 36 to Haddam - redundancy with the first half of the sentence.
Placing this article on hold - shouldn't be too difficult to fix. --Rschen7754 08:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I think I have fixed everything. — PCB 15:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Passing GA. --Rschen7754 20:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)