Talk:Kaivalya Upanishad/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
@Nvvchar: Will review. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 05:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I have collaborated with User:Ms Sarah Welch who will also respond.Nvvchar. 13:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Why is the name in italics while heading is not? It is not uniform in the text either.
- Fixed. Both are italics.
- Do not use citations in the lead. Use them only in main text.
- Indeed. I moved some text and all sources from the lead into the main article. I had to move some text so that nothing in the lead appears unsourced/unsupported in the main article.
- Upanishads linked twice.
- Fixed.
Etymology
[edit]- Who is Deussen?
- Added, wikified and source there verified
Chronology
[edit]- Link Shiva and Hinduism as they are first mentioned.
- Done by @Nvvchar
Structure
[edit]- What is a poetic meter?
- It should have been Vedic meter, wikified and added explanation
- Duplinks: Mundaka Upanishad and Shvetashvatara Upanishad
- thus referencing them, yet building Comma should be replaced with "And".
- Done by @Nvvchar
Content
[edit]- Only one duplink : Brahma.
- Done by @Nvvchar
- translate Deussen and other scholars other scholars is vague, how about et. al.?
- Fixed
- You forget to mention "states the text" in places ,it is almost as if you are saying all this. Introduce that phrase regularly.
- Done by @Nvvchar
Commentaries
[edit]- Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan translated it in his 1953 book The Principal Upanishads. No source for this?
- Added
- published first in 1971 "first published".
- Done by @Nvvchar
- @Sainsf: Thanks for the review. Your detailed review and points were helpful. @Nvvchar: Please double check my edits and if I missed anything or duplinks, please fix. Also, both @Redtigerxyz and you started this article a year ago, an initiative that is commendable. [[User:@Sainsf:|Ms Sarah Welch]] (talk) 00:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Sainsf: The text has been slightly modified by Ms Sarah Welch due to shifting of references from the lead. All review issues have been addressed by her thoroughly. Pl see.Nvvchar. 01:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar: Promoted. Congrats! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 05:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much,@Sainsf:.Nvvchar. 05:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar: Promoted. Congrats! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 05:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)