Talk:Kamagra

Kamagra is a brand - but that does not make this advertising.

If you don't like the article, please do edit it - transform it completely if you want.

But deleting the article will just lead to confusion. People by kamagra all the time on the internet - there is a real need for imformation on the brand.

Even if you don't think encyclopaedias should accommodate social need. That the fact that the brand exists should be recorded as part of the world's knowledge.

Wikipedia DOES carry information on brands of the same substance. Note an article on pepsi cola, coca cola and panda cola.

I have ABSOLUTELY no vested interest in the kamagra brand. It is not available in the UK in any other way than the black market - for that reason alone, a matter of fact article on the brand would be a very useful addition to the sum of useful knowledge on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.Picton (talk • contribs)

Nothing seems substantially notable about this particular brand to justify having a page specifically about this brand. Sure, there's lots notable about sildenafil in general and various formulations of it, and probably lots to say about black-market or patent-ignoring producers of it, but none of that seems particular to this brand. Therefore, makes more sense to cover the ideas on the generic-drug's page, since at heart that's what it's really about. DMacks 02:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)