Talk:Kenny Roberts/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
I will begin this review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- *"and as a racing team owner and constructor" in lede - what does this mean "constructor"? constructor of teams?
- *The result of his earlier application of the throttle was that, he was able to attain top speed faster than his competitors. - Suggestion: Because of his early application of the throttle, he was able to attain top speed faster than his competitors?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- *one fair-use
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Very nice article. I have only a few nit-picks. I made the following edits which I think were needed.[1]
- I will put this on hold for seven days. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- All nit-picks fixed. Article passes GA. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Thanks for your help. I've made the edits you suggested (clarified the definition of constructor). Since this is my first GA nomination, I'm not sure what edits I am supposed to make on this page.Orsoni (talk) 04:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing further is required from you. It's listing as a GA will happen now. MathewTownsend (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)