Talk:Kepler-6/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lord Roem (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Lord Roem (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A quick first thing - add a bit more to the lead and more to the characteristics section. Maybe explain any unique qualities. Also, write a bit more on the end result of the Kepler mission. Was it successful? Best regards, Lord Roem (talk) 02:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before I start, there are a couple things I should clarify. The first thing is that the Kepler Mission is not yet complete; Kepler-6 was only one of many finds it has made. The second thing is that little or nothing unique has been found yet of the star other than the fact that it has a planet in its orbit; the star has received no exclusive press coverage and was not emphasized at the AAS meeting where its discovery was announced, at least to my knowledge. I'm not sure there is anything left to add in that section as compared to other stars.

I'll take a look at the lead as soon as I can, though. Thank you for taking up this review. :)

Thanks, --Starstriker7^(Talk) 08:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just remembered that I could recomb the Kepler website for more data. Perhaps I'll be able to expand the Characteristics section after all. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 17:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see no further issues. Promoted! Lord Roem (talk) 21:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]