Jump to content

Talk:Kepler-9/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: the link to KOI-377.03 redirects back to this article so, you should de-link KOI-377.03. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot:

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Complies sufficiently, I made one minor copy-edit
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Ref #1[1] failed verification. The information may be elsewhere on this site.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As broad as is reasonable given this is a recent discovery.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Suitable rationale and caption
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just one reference needs fixing. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I have resolved all the pointers you've brought up. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Well done, I just couldn't find that on the site, but imagined that it would be there. I am now happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much. :D --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]