Talk:Kicks (song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- "...wrote the song for The Animals, but lead singer Eric Burdon turned it down." Think it would be better if you were to put "the band's lead singer" here.
- "The result was "Kicks," a song originally offered to the Animals, but Eric Burdon turned it down." Consider rewording to "a song originally offered to the Animals, but turned down by lead singer Eric Burdon".
- "Within two months of its release, the single sold 500,000 copies." Should probably say "had sold"
- "causing a perception by members of the burgeoning youth counterculture" Don't like "causing a perception" here.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- There don't appear to be cites for some of the cover versions in the "Other versions" section.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- A tracklisting for the live single might be nice.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Very good article, shouldn't be too much work to get up to standard. Cavie78 (talk) 22:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- All issues addressed, I believe. Regarding the 1982 live single tracklisting, I learned of the single's apparent existence by viewing the Singles Discography at Paul Revere's official site, but as I can find no other verifiable sources, I removed both references to the single. Gongshow ⊕ 04:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've passed the article, good work! Cavie78 (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for the kind words, for taking the time to review the article, and for the suggestions. Gongshow ⊕ 01:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've passed the article, good work! Cavie78 (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)