Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I will take up the review for this nomination and present it to you in some time. Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- The issues are resolved now so I'll promote the article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- The last four producers and the editor mentioned in the infobox are not mentioned in those roles (or not mentioned at all) in the body nor are they cited in the infobox. Di Bonaventura Pictures is abbreviated as "di B Pictures" in the infobox, the shouldn't it be "dB Pictures"?
Working
Done 1. Added Panic Room format. 2. The company is credited as "di B Pictures" in the poster. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- "... with Halle Berry attached to star ..." The use of "attached to" in the phrase sounds odd, I would suggest using "featured as" instead. I would also suggest adding a comma before the "with".
- "... while still owing the feature itself $15 million ..." This phrase isn't very clear. I would suggest adding a "worth" after itself.
Assessment
[edit]- Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
- Stability: The article is stable.
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. | Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | Sources used are reliable. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | No original research found. | Pass
|
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No flagrant copyright issues found. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The article broadly covers all major aspects. | Pass
|
| (b) (focused) | The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Use and caption are good. | Pass
|