Talk:Koh-i-Sultan/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tisquesusa (talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Very complete article about a volcano little known, good job

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Well-written, correct grammar, lead is ok, but could be expanded a bit, lay-out good
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Extensive list of reliable references, wording is not copyvio'd, neat
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Complete overview of the various characteristics of this volcano. Enough detail about the rock types, ages and location
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No bias in this relatively sensitive region between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No problems
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
More images could be added, but there are none freely available of this mountain at Commons, so ok
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Compliments for creating an extensive well-written article about a relatively unknown and for Pakistan unusual volcano. Great article.

Hum. @Tisquesusa: seems like the passing has not been registered. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]