Talk:Kumawat

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

restored, 22 October 2016, see discussion.
moot, 22 October 2016, see DRV.
delete, July 9 2008, see discussion.

Kumawat is a Rajput Caste

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

202.128.111.4 (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes kumawat is a kshatriya caste and all kshatriya castes come under rajputs Sparkinade (talk) 04:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research; WP:OR! No reliable source supports the above statements. Ekdalian (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

106.207.249.162 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

for mutual discussion

I "Ekdalian" want to discuss increasing knowledge about Kumawat Wikipedia page. There is no sufficient information bro about Kumawat

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vm_KCE4XXPMC&pg=PA562&dq=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4+%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF+%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwisr_uFrOqFAxW6yjgGHQj5CzQ4ChDoAXoECAIQAw#v=onepage&q=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%20%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&f=falsehTs reference i

is suit for it-able दीपसिंह 16:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

K. S. Singh (Popular Prakashan) is not considered as reliable by the community. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks....

This is final as our old written evidence.

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.494949

Should I change the Wikipedia page based on this reference? दीपसिंह 02:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything written in this K.S. singh'book is true bro. If you were from Rajasthan, you would have good knowledge of our culture bro. दीपसिंह 02:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, even if it is true, we can't deviate from our policies regarding use of unreliable source. There's an existing consensus regarding this particular source and we are not supposed to use the same. Please try to find other sources, modern scholarly work by reliable authors. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your time

I will continue my efforts दीपसिंह 12:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]