Jump to content

Talk:Léon Gambetta-class cruiser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Léon Gambetta-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]

1. Prose  Pass

2. Verifiability  Pass

3. Depth of Coverage  Pass

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous  Pass

Comments

[edit]

1.

  • "The Léon Gambetta-class cruisers" - I'd say it's probably okay to bold the entire word cruisers, it looks a little odd with just the ending s unbolded
  • In the text, 12,550 metric tons is rounded to 12,350 long tons, while in the infobox, 12,352 long tons are given. Is there a way that the rounding can be made consistent?
    • Done
  • "She visited the United States in 1907 to" - Is this still the Victor Hugo?
    • Yep, she's the last ship explicitly named.
  • "She visited the United States in 1907 to participate in the Jamestown, Virginia, to participate in the Jamestown Exposition" - Grammar's a touch off here
    • Oops.
  • " in the Adriatic" - Wikilink the Adriatic, since it's the first mention in the main body of prose
    • I only link once per article unless it's a really long article.
  • " with heavy loss of life the following day" - Is this exact figure known? If so, it may be worth mentioning.

2.

  • Deck armor is given as 33-65 mm in the infobox, there's no citation and I can't find the 33 mm figure in the text
    • Three layers of 11 mm mild steel plates.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  • "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States" - According to the file information for the blueprint plans "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States", and such a tag is not present.
    • Done.

7.

Placing on hold, this one doesn't need much work done.

Thanks for the review and catching all these niggles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, passing. Hog Farm (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]