Talk:Larisa Iordache/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
I note there is a previous PR: Wikipedia:Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed?
Regardless, really amazing article - quite well researched, excellent density of citations.
- date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB
- quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point.
I will address each GA point:
- Well written
- prose is clear and understandable. It does not flow as easily as an FA grade article, but I may be able to help with that.
- the structure is excellent, lead section is three paragraphs long which is on the border of the ecessive length, but I think it is acceptable. I see no problematic phrases.
- Verifiable and NOR
- I cannot see any original research
- referencing seems excellent
- I am not a domain expert, so it is somewhat hard for me to comment on the quality of the linked news articles. Also, I don’t speak Romanian.
- Coverage
- Seems to cover the life of the subject well, good table summary of achievements
- does not diverge from the topic
- Neutrality
- the use of quotes potentially needs some contextualising, this is a minor issue and perhaps my own personal bug bear; otherwise it is quite neutral in tone
- Stability
- seems fine
- Illustrated
- use of images is excellent, well done
Hope this is helpful! Excellent work from the contributor(s). - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Hi @Aussie Article Writer, thanks for reviewing!
- I note there is a previous PR: Wikipedia:Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed?
Yes, they were back when the review was done in 2014.
- date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB.
Done
- quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point.
Done I added more context to the quotes throughout the article, but if you think it's not enough, let me know
Thank you! -Riley1012 (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Riley1012: well done, this os now categorised as a GA. I left you a message in your talk page for a further suggestion, but not one that affects GA status. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)