Talk:Lascar (volcano)/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anne drew Andrew and Drew (talk · contribs) 14:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Well written
- Prose:
Very well written and informative. No issues here.
- Style:
Great
- Prose:
- Verifiable
- Citations:
no formatting issues that I can see
- Reliable sources:
Well sourced
- No Original Research:
good here
- Citations:
- Broad in coverage
- All major aspects:
All major details covered
- No unnecessary detail:
Good to see that the town distance table has been replaced with an image as requested in GA1. No more issues here.
- All major aspects:
- Neutral point of view:
All good
- Stable:
No edit warring
- Images:
Very well illustrated, no copyvio issues. Even includes a Commons Picture of the Year.
- Pass/Fail:
Pass! Thanks for your contributions.
- Comment: Great work on this article - almost featured quality. Happy to pass.