Talk:Latgalians
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]I think this page should be moved for consistency; both "l" and double "l" are common, but the former is increasingly more frequently used (357:251 at Google) and about half of the linked Wiki aricles (e.g., Latgalian language) use the single "l" ...even the "Latgallians" article itself was not consistent in its spelling. Pēteris Cedriņš 12:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]Latgallians → Latgalians – Consistency; both "l" and double "l" are common, but the former is increasingly more frequently used (357:251 at Google) and about half of the linked Wiki aricles (e.g., Latgalian language) use the single "l" ...even the "Latgallians" article itself was not consistent in its spelling.
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support. Google Books and Google Scholar both indicate the single "l" is used more frequently. Olessi 01:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Two different articles
[edit]Latgalians (ancient) and Latgals (modern) must be separate articles not to confuse! Puuce (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)