Jump to content

Talk:League of Legends/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 12:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have to give this article a quick fail. The lead is too short, the development is almost completly unreferenced, and most of the article is about the gameplay.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Some sections should be written as prose and it does not follow the Manual of Style
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No references in the "Development" section, recognised as "OR"
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fix development, as stated above.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    Seems pretty good.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Other than the boxart, there is nothing. No image of the developers, maybe a screenshot...nothing.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    As you can see, this article will need A LOT of work before it can pass. Good luck! --Khanassassin (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Things to do

[edit]
  • The lead - The lead should contain a little of everything. The gameplay, story, development, release, reception...
  • Gameplay - The section should be a bit shortened, since most of the article is about the gameplay. I also spoted a "[citation needed]" in there.
  • Story - A section dedicated to the story, if the game has one.
  • Development and Distribution - The development section really needs lots of references, and a few could be added the Distribution section
  • Reception - The award table should probably be converted to prose