Talk:Li'l Sebastian/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) – talk 03:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
We are almost ready! May we have a photo of somebody, tho? :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 07:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- I added a pic of Ben Schwartz. I don't have an infobox image because they keep getting challenged and deleted lately. I could use a screenshot under a fair use rationale if I could justify why it explains a scene or aspect of the episode better than words possibly could. Perhaps after you read the article you can tell me if you have any suggestions for something that you think could be clarified or explained better with an image? — Hunter Kahn 12:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing needs explained better :) But for tooting the season finale, since Leslie and Ben were particulary praised, a double-img of them in Reviews would be coolish! Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. Added the images. — Hunter Kahn 14:05, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Great! Pass Rcej (Robert) – talk 07:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing needs explained better :) But for tooting the season finale, since Leslie and Ben were particulary praised, a double-img of them in Reviews would be coolish! Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Results of review
[edit]The article Li'l Sebastian passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass