Jump to content

Talk:Lilliputian Hitcher/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I'll be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looking good.

  • Only few isses I see are addressing what Production I.G and Gainax are when first mentioned Got a similar response when dealing with that Jujutsu Kaisen 0 movie.
  • Is it possible to balance the lead a bit? The first paragraph is kinda big in comparison to the following ones.
  • "of ozone in the area" might explain a bit this in case somebody is confused.
  • "Evangelion Chronicle magazine, on the other hand, noted how Okamura, in charge of producing the storyboards, blends science fiction and human drama into his works.[21]" seems fitting for the reception
  • There is something important that might be missing in Plot. What's Ritsuko's focus that's mentioned in reception?

@TeenAngels1234: That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I should have everything sorted out. The only point is the one about Evangelion Chronicle: since it is an official encyclopaedia licensed by Gainax - which I believe also gave the first-hand canon materials to write it - I don't find it pertinent to move the info to Repection.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passing the review. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]