Talk:Line Art

Merge suggestion

The articles should be

(a) merged
(b) computer art split off into an article separate from thraditional line art. `'mikka (t) 07:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As "line art" is not a proper name, I think it would be more appropriate to merge Line Art into Line art. Jobarts^-Talk 07:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that article should be merged into 'line art'. Example: Folk art and Graphic design. I'll also do some cleanup on Line Art too. Clubmarx 20:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a rewrite to cleanup this and to incorporate the other Line art page.

I moved examples of line art to the second section, leaving the first section for the definition. Took away POV text – like use of 'perversity.' Both versions state line art doesn't have to be monochromatic, so that point is maintained.

In the second section, there was a lot of description of the general methods. I took a lot away, but I think they didn't directly related to this subject. They seem more appropriate within the page about the full subject not here. I limited it to just how that technique relates to the immediate subject, line art. For example, the etching section was just about etching, without mentioning line art.

So, these still need to be merged. I left the capitalization as is, but I think this should be the main article, but just under 'Line art'. Clubmarx 21:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion I'll move the content from here to Line art, and redirect. Kevin 09:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]