Talk:List of Big Brother (American TV series) houseguests/Archive 1
File:Mnoonan.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]
|
An image used in this article, File:Mnoonan.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
|
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Table sorting[edit]
The table sorting doesn't work (I suspect because of the "split" rows, e.g. the "Alison Irwin" row). DH85868993 (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- While the new table (based on this one) isn't perfect, it at least eliminates the problem with the split rows. Should complete the table tomorrow! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Removal of Excessive Duplicate Links[edit]
Do we really need to have more than 10 links that point to the same article (Case-In-Point: a particular season of Big Brother)? It is unnecessary to have that many duplicate links, so I have cleaned up the article to remove those excess duplicate links. Also, I have included thin black lines to keep each season separate.--OfficerAPC (talk) 01:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- But now the table is not sortable, which is problematic. I suggest a revert. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- The table can still be sortable, viewers would need to ignore the thin black lines that were used to make the table more organized.--OfficerAPC (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think sortable is better and I don't think the dark black lines are necessary. Yes, they look fine for a static table, but not for a sortable one. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- The table can still be sortable, viewers would need to ignore the thin black lines that were used to make the table more organized.--OfficerAPC (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)