Talk:List of geneticists

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal List of geneticists is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Comment

Either merge or 1 genetics + 1 biochemistry. Almost everyone here is one or the other--for the few notable in both, they can go on both lists. DGG 06:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thank TB Hecht

for his excellent work in adding so many. DGG 07:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wording of title

Should the page titles for this entire category be changed to "List of notable chemists [etc]. It makes the purpose clearer , and differentiates them from category, which is simple and automatically all the chemists who happen to have actual pages here.? List of notable... is used for many other similar purposes. I suppose we in science can be distinctive and use ours the way it is, but it would be useful to have it said explicitly.DGG 04:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

most notable

This extraordinarily excellent list might benefit from some indication of relative importance--perhaps a separate list?DGG 21:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too many red links

There are a great many red links in this list, indicating people that by Wikipedia conventions are not notable. Some of them probably do need articles, and someone should create them. For the moment I shall do nothing, but I'll come back in, say, October 2023 to see if the situation has improved. Athel cb (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]