Talk:M102 howitzer

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Vandalism?

The article has the following specification.

Weight: 1.6 tons (4.7 t)

US Army source site Army.mil fact file gives a weight of 3004 lbs which is US 1.5 short tons (1.4 t) metric. Guess that we all have to take a look at details on Wiki articles to see if they make any sense. --TGC55 (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under Slung?

I've never heard this term used in general for military transportation.

I suspect that the term should be 'sling loaded,' most likely with a Westland Wessex class helo.

I'll try to find more specific information, unless someone has it to hand already.

ck DocKrin (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muzzle Brakes

Muzzle brakes did seem to be dispensed with at some point, but they did make it to Vietnam.--172.192.9.26 (talk) 08:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]