Talk:MRNA display

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

If anyone happens to read this, the title of this page should be "mRNA display" not "MRNA display". The convention when referring to different types of RNA is to use a lower case prefix notation.

English Wikipedia always capitalizes the first letter of an article title so that links at the beginning of a sentence and links in the middle of a sentence go to the same article. Therefore, such a move would be a no-op. Try using {{lowercase}} instead; use the article iPod as an example of how to set it up. But it appears that somebody has made an inadvertent mess by trying to move the article several times, and cleaning this up may need a sysop's attention. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 00:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks for the help. The number of redirects is quite ridiculous, it was an attempt at renaming that didn't go so well. Lancepickens 00:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is terribly boosterish. It reads like a long-winded press release and makes no mention of what disadvantages the technique might have vs. competing approaches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.225.175 (talk) 04:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too many advertisements in this article

Hi guys, It seems like a few biotech companies have shown their interest in highlighting the advances of their technologies in this article. For instance this includes PROMEGA, NOVAGEN, PURE, SUPERSCRIPT II. This gets to the point where it's annoying, irrelevant and difficult to read. If these references are included, it would be nice to have a separate section, such as "Relevant biotech procedures".

Best regards, Simon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibrunne (talk • contribs) 09:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fugures

Why figure numbering starts with 2? Fig. 1 seems to be lost. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Fig. 1 is missing. Re-numbered the figures. BMoeyaert (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]