Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Replaced content with 'WIKIPEDIA IS THE BEST, NEVER STOP USING IT!!!!! P.S. ALL OF THE OTHER TOPICS STUNK, CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT SOMETHING NEW???' |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
WIKIPEDIA IS THE BEST, NEVER STOP USING IT!!!!! |
|||
<includeonly></includeonly><!-- ''Please start'' new discussion at the bottom of this talk page, or use the EDIT button beside the section heading to add to it. This "section edit button" is important, so please use it --> |
|||
[[Category:Main Page]] |
|||
{{Talk:Main Page/HelpBox}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|||
|counter = 121 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(3d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Main Page/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
{{skiptotoctalk}} |
|||
{{Talk:Main Page/Archives}} |
|||
<div style="right:10px;" class="metadata topicon">'''{{Currentdate}}'''</div> |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors}} |
|||
=General discussion= |
|||
__TOC__ |
|||
<!-- --------------- |
|||
Please start new discussion at the bottom of this talk page, or use the EDIT button beside the section heading to add to it. The edit button is important, so please use it. |
|||
------------------ --> |
|||
P.S. ALL OF THE OTHER TOPICS STUNK, CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT SOMETHING NEW??? |
|||
== AfD for something linked to from the main page == |
|||
Some fool has listed the "recent deaths" list on [[WP:AfD]]. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 17:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Are you sure? I can't see it. '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 17:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The discussion is [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths in 2008|here]], but I suspect it will be closed shortly. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: AfD now closed, per WP:SNOW. WikiUniverse now back in order... --[[Special:Contributions/74.13.129.73|74.13.129.73]] ([[User talk:74.13.129.73|talk]]) 09:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Michael, though I'm sure you meant no harm, I don't think using the term "fool" was a good choice of words. It could be considered a [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attack]] and hurt the feelings of the person it was directed at. --[[User:Puchiko|Puchiko]] ([[User Talk:Puchiko|Talk]]-[[Special:Emailuser/Puchiko|email]]) 13:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Today is Heath Ledger's birthday == |
|||
Someone can put his birthday on the Main Page. Thank you. -[[Special:Contributions/165.21.155.111|165.21.155.111]] ([[User talk:165.21.155.111|talk]]) 14:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: We only do 100th, 200th, 250th, 500th... etc. birthdays of really notable historical figures. --[[Special:Contributions/199.71.174.100|199.71.174.100]] ([[User talk:199.71.174.100|talk]]) 14:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::We the editors or we the anons? [[Special:Contributions/68.101.123.219|68.101.123.219]] ([[User talk:68.101.123.219|talk]]) 16:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::"[[We the people]]" of [[English Wikipedia]], logged in or otherwise. --[[Special:Contributions/74.13.131.110|74.13.131.110]] ([[User talk:74.13.131.110|talk]]) 19:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Punctuation @ In the News == |
|||
In the first item, the sentence reads, "...a main shopping street Cyprus' divided capital of Nicosia." |
|||
In any dictionary you care to reference, whether it's the O.E.D. or Webster's, the rule dealing with the formation of the possessive in English states "add an apostrophe and the letter 's' to singular nouns and names". A few exceptions are commonly made for Biblical and mythological names (Jesus' or Zeus'), but the vast majority of words in English should be handled accordingly. This rule reflects the way the genitive case in English changed between the time of Chaucer and Shakespeare (Chaucer's 'my lordes warre' became 'my lord's war'), and the way most people pronounce the possessive even today. |
|||
I realise that a so-called 'convention' has crept into the copy-editing protocols of many publications that eliminates the final 's' for the possessive of singular nouns ending in 's'. This lunacy has infected even such august rags as Time Magazine and The Wall Street Journal. To me, the lone apostrophe just doesn't 'read' correctly, because it doesn't reflect how one actually ''says'' the word in question! |
|||
All I can say is: there's no justification for the perpetuation of ignorance, whatever the source. If all the periodicals in the English-speaking world were to adopt this bogus practice (and I'm happy to say, not all of them have), it still doesn't make it right. |
|||
[[User:Cbrodersen|Cbrodersen]] ([[User talk:Cbrodersen|talk]]) 14:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Wanna have something changed? See [[#Main Page error reports]] above. --[[Special:Contributions/199.71.174.100|199.71.174.100]] ([[User talk:199.71.174.100|talk]]) 14:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Whoa! Spot on! Damn the torpedos and full steam ahead!!! I for one agree that this linguistically cognitive crap consists of nothing but communication conundrums and should be corrected. [[Special:Contributions/68.143.88.2|68.143.88.2]] ([[User talk:68.143.88.2|talk]]) 15:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::"Linguistically cognitive crap consist[ing] of nothing but communication conundrums" that should be "corrected"--unbridled alliteration at its finest! Love it!! [[User:Cbrodersen|Cbrodersen]] ([[User talk:Cbrodersen|talk]]) 15:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::Cbroderson and 68.143.88.2, my new heroes! May the 's always be used! I already requested a change, but someone ignorant in punctuation said either way is acceptable. <font color="#1EC112" size="3px">[[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]</font><sup><font color="#45E03A">[[User talk:Reywas92|'''Talk''']]</font></sup> 19:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::If the manual of style says it's okay then it's okay. Either reach consensus to change the manual of style (which should take place there not here), or accept that it is okay. We are not going to fix an 'error' when our own manual of style says it's not an error. The MOS is there for a reason and that reason isn't so it can be arbirarily ignored [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 19:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Of course, you're correct--this talk page is not the place to make the correction. But the MOS is flat-out wrong, and I believe the history of English grammar (and the dictionaries) are the irrefutable authorities on the matter. It should be noted that Wikipedia contains many far more serious errors than this waiting to be fixed. Most people don't give a rat's ass about grammar, and when confronted with their mistake, will defend their error to the death, or accuse the person who pointed out the mistake of being an 'anal-retentive pedant'. [[User:Cbrodersen|Cbrodersen]] ([[User talk:Cbrodersen|talk]]) 20:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Actually, I have no personal opinion on this 'error' except to note the MOS doesn't agree with you it is an error. If you were to try to change the MOS, I probably wouldn't be involved in that. As you have already acknowledged, this is not the place to change the MOS and if the MOS is flat out wrong, then it has to be changed. Adhoc changing 'errors' resulting from a flawed MOS is clearly not the way to go and having long arguments on irrelevant places which will achieve nothing, whenever this comes up, is also pointless. Since you seem to be a bit of an expert on this matter, I don't personally get why you don't just try to reach consensus to change the MOS. If you do, then it will be simple to fix this error in the future and ultimately this error will be removed from the whole of wikipedia over time. If you try but fail, then you just have to accept that despite your opinion, there is no consensus for your views of English grammar in this particular matter. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 05:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:"This rule reflects the way the genitive case in English changed between the time of Chaucer and Shakespeare (Chaucer's 'my lordes warre' became 'my lord's war')"... "If [everyone] were to adopt this bogus practice... it still doesn't make it right." |
|||
:So which one is it? English is allowed to change or it isn't? Maybe it should be "Cypruses". ;) [[User:Cigarette|Cigarette]] ([[User talk:Cigarette|talk]]) 20:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::You're basically talking through your hat. Dictionaries such as the Oxford English Dictionary and Merriam-Webster's are the authorities governing grammar and usage in English (despite what the MOS may say). Currently, the primary rule for the formation of the possessive in both these reference works is as I have stated above--there are no 'changes' underfoot that I am aware of, unless one feels that the preponderance of errors made by illiterate, uneducated users of English on the Internet and elsewhere is justification for making a 'change'. |
|||
::I, for one, feel that if these grammatical dunces can't get with the program, then they should just 'get out of the way'. There are a lot more pressing problems in the world to solve, and I've already expended more energy on this subject than I care to.[[User:Cbrodersen|Cbrodersen]] ([[User talk:Cbrodersen|talk]]) 21:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::You are arguing, in essence, for [[prescription and description|prescription over description]], and toward the proposition that certain long-standing grammatical rules, at least as codified by two chosen (although prominent) reference works, are immutable. One may very reasonably so argue—I, in fact, was once exceedingly sympathetic to the argument you advance—but it is the consensus of the community that our MoS properly reflects what the community, in their considered judgment, understand to be "proper English", and one, even if he/she is unquestionably correct, does well to quibble with that understanding at [[WT:MOS]] (or perhaps [[WP:RD/L]]) and not at an insular page. [[User:Jahiegel|Joe]] ([[User talk:Jahiegel|I can has barnstar?]]) 22:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Rather then accusing people of being 'grammatical dunces' who can't 'get with the program' and giving long off-topic arguments here, I suggest again you take it to the MOS. So far, from what I can tell, no one has defended the way the MOS is written in this particular matter, simply pointed out that it is the way it is written, so you are basically arguing with no one. If you had diverted your energy wasted here to actually trying to change the MOS, for all we know it might have been changed by now. Or perhaps not... At least you would have achieved more then going on a long off-topic rant about an issue no one has tried to debate with you [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 05:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: I can't believe this punctuation issue can drag on for so long. The blurb on ITN now says "...Nicosia, the divided capital of Cyprus", hopefully avoiding the punctuation issue completely. I hope everyone is happy and can get back to writing encyclopedic articles (and more DYK candidates to nominate....) --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 06:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Maybe you should all check the OED more often on other topics, too, such as the pronunciation guide for "aluminium", and you'll see how wrong Americans have been saying it all these years..... With respect to the usage of the 's termination, may I point out that it is a '''general''' rule, and, as such, is affected by a number of '''exceptions'''. Again, if you check either OED or Collins Dictionary '''''in their entirety''''', maybe you'll get to see that, in fact, nouns ended in s only need to have an apostrophe added in order to denote posession, and only in the case of persons' names can an "s" be, optionally, added after the punctuation sign. So, enough of gratuitously insulting the rest of us, thank you very much! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.37.39.161|213.37.39.161]] ([[User talk:213.37.39.161|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.37.39.161|contribs]]) 19:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
|||
: We respect many local variations of English in English Wikipedia. The use of American English is okay here. --[[Special:Contributions/74.13.130.186|74.13.130.186]] ([[User talk:74.13.130.186|talk]]) 21:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Talk:Main Page]] looks odd under modern skin. == |
|||
[[Image:TalkMainPageModern.jpeg|300px|right]] |
|||
In the [[WP:MODERN|modern]] skin, the main page talk (this page) looks odd. See [[:Image:TalkMainPageModern.jpeg]] or look to the right for what I'm talking about. Any idea what the problem is/how to solve it? '''[[User:Firefoxman|ff]]<font color="darkgreen">[[User talk:Firefoxman|m]]</font>''' 17:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:What's so wrong about it? '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 11:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The links on the bottom right are messed up somehow. It happens for me in the default (monobook.js) skin as well in firefox. <font color="#3B9C9C">[[User:Random89|Random]]</font><font color="#F87217">[[User Talk:Random89|89]]</font> 18:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::It may be a problem in [[Template:Main Page discussion footer]], but if it is, I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 20:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Since it looks ugly on all skins, would anyone object to simply removing it? -[[Special:Contributions/62.172.143.205|62.172.143.205]] ([[User talk:62.172.143.205|talk]]) 01:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::I've removed it. The things it links to are linked to in the large box near the top right of this article. - [[User:Mark|Mark]] 03:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Featured Picture == |
|||
I request that the featured picture not be shown at the bottom of the page, but be made more visible beside the featured article. Is this possible? [[Special:Contributions/24.65.164.230|24.65.164.230]] ([[User talk:24.65.164.230|talk]]) 20:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Not really, we need the width for when we have panoramas. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 22:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Why can this site can be better this Wikipedia. But why does this happen. Things can happen. You will see articles that happen.--[[User:JoshuaGrant36|JoshuaGrant36]] ([[User talk:JoshuaGrant36|talk]]) 14:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Er what? [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 14:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Sorry? '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 21:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::yeh seriously, what?[[User:Tourskin|Tourskin]] ([[User talk:Tourskin|talk]]) 04:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Bette Davis pic == |
|||
Can someone please consider changing the picture of Bette Davis? - the "Skeffington" shot is almost unrecognizable as being her. The one from All About Eve (Image:Bette Davis in All About Eve trailer.jpg) is probably the best representation of her of the shots in the article. [[User:Ed Fitzgerald|'''Ed Fitzgerald''' (unfutz)]] <b><small><sup>([[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|cont]])</sup></small></b> 22:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: ''Bette Davis has left the MainPage.... '' (That was yesterday's TFA.) Next time you want some small changes made on MainPage, please post your request/suggestion at [[#Main Page error reports]] above (or [[WP:ERRORS]]). Response is usually better there. Hope this helps. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 02:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks much. [[User:Ed Fitzgerald|'''Ed Fitzgerald''' (unfutz)]] <b><small><sup>([[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|cont]])</sup></small></b> 05:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Aesthetics == |
|||
I've just been browsing through the alternate wikipedias and I've noticed that the Italian version looks great and makes ours look like a joke. Better skins, icons, layout and a far more noticeable title. The English main page is in desperate need of an update. '''N. Roberts''' 07:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, I have to agree adamantly. I think the Italian one is a bit crowded due to a lack of padding, but I like how there are buttons that change color, and some just look better. I like the design now, but I recall visiting a Wikipedia with an intricate design (I think it was one of the Cyrillic countries). Found it, it's the Serbian Wikipedia (http://sr.wikipedia.org/). Also, I would like to see a space between the top bar and the page title, like the French Wikipedia. The thing with the French Wikipedia is that the editors there know padding very well and they use it to their advantage. –The [[User:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:red;">Obento</span>]] [[User talk:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:orange;">Musubi</span>]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:green">Contributions</span>]])</small> 08:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::I have to say that I don't like the Italian design. It takes far too long to load, and I think that's why this page isn't as overly complex, for easy access for a, say, dailup connection. Sorry to disappoint, like. '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 08:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, I agree with you, too. Some are over the top; I'm fine with the page it is now. Another cool idea to save space is to do a tab system like the Catalonian Wikipedia. I don't care for the buttons they have, but it's a good idea. I like ours for its pure design; it strikes me as pure. In fact, I used that to makeover [[WP:WikiProject Hawaii|WikiProject Hawaii]]. I would put a little more padding, though. It looks so close to the edge. –The [[User:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:red;">Obento</span>]] [[User talk:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:orange;">Musubi</span>]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:green">Contributions</span>]])</small> 08:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::The box at the top looks bland to me, though. I would bold "Welcome to Wikipedia"... and put "There are..." before the content of the third line. –The [[User:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:red;">Obento</span>]] [[User talk:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:orange;">Musubi</span>]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:green">Contributions</span>]])</small> 08:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Fair point, but there's nothing I can do about it, unfortunately. '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 10:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::The Serbian wiki looks pretty good, but I don't think it's as useful, considering you have to scroll way down for OTD and DYK, while stuff like the other project links are nearer to the top. Also, they don't have a Featured Pic. So pretty much, I like their style but not the layout. My only real issue with our main page is the bland and dead space around the header. The individual templates all look fine, but the top of the page could use some work. <font color="#3B9C9C">[[User:Random89|Random]]</font><font color="#F87217">[[User Talk:Random89|89]]</font> 17:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:See [[Wikipedia:Main Page alternatives]], specifically [[Wikipedia:Main Page alternative (Italian-style)]]. Also [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft (Italian Inspired)]] was a draft in the redesign 2 years ago. They were too colorful and unprofessional for many editor's tastes. |
|||
:Possibly a link to Main Page alternatives should be added to the header here, as people keep asking about redesigns, but it isn't linked from here currently. -- [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 19:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Charlton Heston? == |
|||
Perhaps somebody can put news of his death, or about how Aloha Airlines, Skyline, and ATA all went out of business in the same week. –The [[User:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:red;">Obento</span>]] [[User talk:The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:orange;">Musubi</span>]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/The Obento Musubi|<span style="color:green">Contributions</span>]])</small> 08:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Check out [[WP:ITN/C]] where you can nominate and discuss candidates for that section. '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' 08:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Add interwiki == |
|||
To Belarus main page: |
|||
[[be:]] |
|||
& Belarus classical: |
|||
[[be-x-old:]] |
|||
Thanks. Julie. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.128.96.210|195.128.96.210]] ([[User talk:195.128.96.210|talk]]) 10:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hi. Only Wikipedias with at least 20,000 articles and a minimum depth of "5" are included, otherwise the list would be very long and not very useful to an English reader. Belarus only has 10 499 articles so far, even though it meets the depth requirement. Classical only has 9 011 articles, though it also has a decent depth. To see sizes and depths of Wikipedias, chack out [[meta:List of Wikipedias]]. --[[User:Puchiko|Puchiko]] ([[User Talk:Puchiko|Talk]]-[[Special:Emailuser/Puchiko|email]]) 13:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Just wondering, what do you mean by 'depth'? -- <span style="background:#ffff00;border:2px solid #00bfff;">[[User:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="hotpink">'''Naerii'''</font>]]</span> 21:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::The "depth" calculation has something to do with total number of edits and number of articles, it's a mathematical formula. It is explained at [[meta:List of Wikipedias]] <font color="#3B9C9C">[[User:Random89|Random]]</font><font color="#F87217">[[User Talk:Random89|89]]</font> 21:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::It is explained at the linked page, [[meta:List of Wikipedias]]. I'll try to explain here, but you'll be probably be better off reading the three lines one the original page.<br />The depth is calculated as: (Edits/Articles) × (Non-Articles/Articles) × (1 − Stub-ratio). This was introduced to identify Wikipedias such as the [[Volapük Wikipedia]]. These wikis just run [[bot]]s to create stubs from templates, e.g. translating town infoboxes from other languages. Therefore, these Wikipedias might have a huge number of articles, but a low depth. [[User:Puchiko|Puchiko]] ([[User Talk:Puchiko|Talk]]-[[Special:Emailuser/Puchiko|email]]) 21:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Featured article: "Tiananmen Square protests of 1989", please == |
|||
Could we please add the article [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]] in a high priority position to appear in the featured article section? Reason: China selectively censors certain pages, would need to censor the homepage to remain consitent, but then it could no longer say they are not censoring wikipedia. Thanks! [[User:Enobeno|Enobeno]] ([[User talk:Enobeno|talk]]) 21:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:That particular article isn't a [[WP:FA|featured article]] now, but it used to be, and was featured on the Main Page already. Any given article can only be the [[WP:TFA|today's featured article]] once.--[[User:Fyre2387|Fyre2387]] <sup>([[User talk:Fyre2387|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fyre2387|contribs]])</sup> 22:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:It already showed up [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Selected_anniversaries/April_5 yesterday]. The 1976 one at least. [[Special:Contributions/128.227.127.134|128.227.127.134]] ([[User talk:128.227.127.134|talk]]) 22:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Articles appear on the On This Day/Selected anniversaries section of the main page regardless of whether or not they are [[WP:FA|Wikipedia featured articles]]. The [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]] article is scheduled [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 4|to appear on the main page on June 4]] to mark the anniversary of the army's crackdown. The [[Goddess of Democracy]] is scheduled [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/May 30|to go on May 30]]. Cheers. [[User:Zzyzx11|Zzyzx11]] [[User talk:Zzyzx11|(Talk)]] 23:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Besides, I believe putting up an FA just to provoke a government is silly. All it would cause would be that Chinese people would be unable to access the Main Page. Though I'd have no objection to [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]] appearing as a regular FA (which it already has, so it can not again) I'd be against prioritising it simply for the sake of provocation of a government. [[User:Puchiko|Puchiko]] ([[User Talk:Puchiko|Talk]]-[[Special:Emailuser/Puchiko|email]]) 21:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:32, 7 April 2008
WIKIPEDIA IS THE BEST, NEVER STOP USING IT!!!!!
P.S. ALL OF THE OTHER TOPICS STUNK, CAN WE PLEASE TALK ABOUT SOMETHING NEW???