Jump to content

Talk:Manjappada/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 07:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comments

[edit]
I don't see any other issues.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI

[edit]

 DonePoppified (talk) 11:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Lee Vilenski (in WP:Discord)

[edit]
  • During the 2018–19 season, the Blasters were winless in 14 games and fans became dissatisfied with the management's indifference towards them. Although Manjappada boycotted a December 2018 game against Jamshedpur FC,[19] "We don’t intend to boycott our club’s matches, since our motto is 'Nammalk Nammalund' ('We have us')" stated the group. - not really sure what this means  DoneShahoodu (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "Manjappada stand" originated in 2014, during the Blasters' first season.[ - what is this? :Clarified  DoneShahoodu (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Id argue that culture section needs a rewrite - most of it is obvious, or pointless.  Done Shahoodu (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's a few refs that have weird |work parameters, such as Sportskeeda APP is the No 1 Personalised Sports APP available today. Just select your fav teams & players and you are done.  Done. Iamfarzan (talk) 13:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]