Talk:Mano machine

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Clarity of Instruction Set table

I can't help but find the way the table of instructions is outlined a bit on the confusing side. I mean for example the way Mano's Computer system Architecture textbook does it does a better job at showing the leading nybble's hexadecimal representation for direct addressing vs indirect addressing. For example, if you have an ADD, in hex the leftmost nybble [4 bits] is a 1 in direct addressing, a 9 in indirect addressing... a BUN instruction's leftmost nybble is either a 4 in direct addressing, or a C in indirect addressing... and so on and so forth. At this time, I'd rather drag around my copy of Mano's Computer System Architecture textbook. >_<

I'm getting to work on a replacement table that, while not a blatant copy of the table in the textbook, contains the information in what is, IMO of course, a much clearer layout.