Hi; the reason I removed the comment that Mark was acting as a scribe for Peter was that I felt this was too much information for the disambiguation page. It's covered in the article. Feel free to disagree and revert.
Also, I put "Gospel of Mark" in the list with everything else, which is the way "Gospel of Matthew|Luke|John" is handled on the relevant disambiguation pages. Yes, I'm obsessive-compulsive about consistency. :) Jdavidb 14:37, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
True or false?
- This is more a relic from a long time ago when user pages did not have their own namespace, and user pages were in the main article namespace. If you find this improper, feel free to remove it. - Mark 01:58, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) (EDIT: Whoops, it would seem I am wrong, and only placed it there a few months ago. Mark Ryan is the one which is the relic. I am removing this link now. - Mark 02:00, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC))
Gospel title: "according to"
The Greek – in the case of all four Gospel accounts – has kata, Latin secondo, both meaning according to. In other words [The] Good News according to .... There is a lively discussion as to the genre of the Gospels, hence their precise title, while not original but very early all the same, may be considered significant. (It is easy to see, why one often encounters of, even in scholarly writings ... it is 9 characters and 1 space shorter, and rolls better off the tongue.) Portress 03:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Safety not guaranteed
Not verifiable. As such, it doesn't belong here. -Colin Kimbrell 07:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
I dispute this. I think it's a worthy addition. - nrf
I second that. It is quite a nice addition. - Billy500
- Remove per Colin Kimbrell. This link shows up in every imaginable place, and does nothing to improve the quality. Given the linkspamming about, and the usual procedure to discuss changes, not reversions (the link was just added), I am reverting and suggest we reach consensus before adding. Thanks, --Hansnesse 19:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- Added per nrf. The deletion of this link shows up in every imaginable place, and does nothing to improve the quality. I am reverting and suggest we reach consensus before deleting. - nrf
- I'm not sure I understand your point. It has been removed in many pages since it is part of an ongoing problem with vandalism. It has been removed there since it clearly does not belong. Why do you think it belongs here? Incidentally, you can also sign by using ~~~~ on talk pages. Thanks, --Hansnesse 21:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Splitting page up
I think this page should be split up into the disambiguation page and a page about the given name, maybe Mark (given name). According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), disambiguation pages should be kept as short as possible. Comments? --Chl 15:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
He was a great Saint!
Under measurement, mark twian redirects to the writer Mark Twain. i don't believe an article exists about the measurement, and i do not posses the knowledge to creat it. will someone please correct this... Vicgp3 23:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Under measurement, mark twian redirects to the writer Mark Twain. i don't believe an article exists about the measurement, and i do not posses the knowledge to creat it. will someone please correct this... Vicgp3 23:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk)
I removed the redirect which simply came back to this page. I have put a proposal out in Ceramic Art to add a paragraph and later an article on this item. At that time, I will edit here to put a redirect to the new paragraph. Aclayartist (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)