Talk:Marktkirche Unser Lieben Frauen/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Dabsolver check: ok
- Checklinks check: ok
- Comparing with the German article, there is nearly zero information about its architecture.
- There should be neither {{cn}} tags nor unreferenced text.
- So I give you 14 days to expand this article. If you need help, please ask (I contacted the main editor; if he doesn't answer, and if you don't find more information in the public internet, then we must live with it).
- Edit I just received a message by PumpkinSky; I will close this at the request of nominator.--♫GoP♫TCN 13:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)